This is presented for educational content- think about situations where you discuss with another professional and from what perspective you might be having such a conversation. Each will have your own agenda- how do you handle this?

If a GP overrules a colleague, does this look elitist? Is the bottom line that the DNACPR decision is the responsibility of the GP? Is deferring the decision avoiding responsibility?

You're presented quite alot of context and information here to show you a full range of data gathering within the first part of this encounter- your choices in this case centre on managing the scenario.

What are you reflections on how Philomena presents her case here? Any phrases that resonate with you?